Excerpt from Chapter 8

So much of National Socialism can be found in the Folkish movement that it is not surprising two major studies have located the origins of Hitler’s ideology there. Viereck’s Meta-politics: The Roots of the Nazi Mind focuses on the ideas of Wagner. Mosse’s The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich focuses on broader intellectual trends and currents of which Wagner was only a representative. Viereck spends more time elaborating on the Folkish roots in romanticism, especially in philosophy, while Mosse concentrates more on the spread of Folkish ideas through German society in the 19th and early 20th centuries-but in spite of their differences, both studies have a lot in common. Taken together, they provide a significant part of the explanation for Hitler.

Neither Mosse nor Viereck pay much attention to Darwin, and neither of their books lists Darwin in the index. Viereck makes only one passing reference to “social Darwinism,” the belief that the Darwinian law of survival-of-the-fittest applied to people as well as to animals. Mosse devotes a few pages to social Darwinism and recognizes its importance, but asserts the fundamental incompatibility between National Socialism and Darwinism proper. He claims that the Darwinian concept of the origins of man was not acceptable to Nazi race theorists.[i] Not only (in Mosse’s view) was such a humiliating ancestry unsuitable to a race of superior beings destined to rule; it also required a common origin of all races-another blow to the Aryan ego.

It might seem, then, that Darwinism as Darwin taught it is of little relevance to our study-and those who believe that Darwinism is true and beneficial will find no difficulty in detaching it from National Socialism, which was false and harmful. Apart from this basic presupposition, they have a number of other reasonable points to make against the idea of a Hitler-Darwin connection.

For one thing, there are many and great personal dissimilarities between Darwin and Hitler. For another, many people have believed in Darwin’s theories without becoming Nazis, and many countries have ingested Darwinism into their cultural mainstreams without becoming fascist dictatorships. Another argument has already been presented-that a Darwinian concept of the origins of man is incompatible with Naziism. Obviously, Darwinism does not inevitably or necessarily lead to Naziism.

Those on the other hand who do not believe that Darwinism is true have no difficulty seeing a very real connection-and they too have plausible arguments. For one thing, there is Hitler’s Darwinian rhetoric-rhetoric that was elaborated on at length in Mein Kampf and later supported by Hitler’s actions (not, like a very few random comments about Christianity, contradicted by his actions).

Hitler frequently appealed to Darwinian logic. Here are a few examples from one chapter of Mein Kampf:

. . . the most patent principles of Nature’s rule. . .

. . . it will later succumb in the struggle against the higher level . . .

. . . the will of Nature for a higher breeding of all life . . .

Only the born weakling can view this as cruel, but he after all is only a weak and limited man; for if this law did not prevail, any conceivable higher development of organic living beings would be unthinkable.

In the struggle for daily bread all those who are weak and sickly or less determined succumb, while the struggle of the males for the female grants the right or opportunity to propagate only to the healthiest. And struggle is always a means for improving a species’ health and power of resistance and, therefore, a cause of its higher development.

. . . since the inferior always predominates numerically over the best, if both had the same possibility of preserving life and propagating, the inferior would multiply so much more rapidly that in the end the best would inevitably be driven into the background, unless a correction of this state of affairs were undertaken. Nature does just this by subjecting the weaker part to such severe living conditions that by them alone the number is limited, and by not permitting the remainder to increase promiscuously, but making a new and ruthless choice according to strength and health.

. . . exact scientific truth . . . cold logic . . .

. . . the rigid law of necessity and the right to victory of the best and stronger in this world. [vol. I chapt. 11, "Nation and Race"]

Hitler is not angling for votes or trying to deflect opposition here. He is stating that the Darwinian struggle for survival-of-the-fittest is the fundamental law of life, and only weaklings don’t accept it.

This is not a question of a few cut-and-paste quotes. Hitler made many references, in speeches and in writing, to nature’s elimination of the unfit as essential to progress. Moreover, in a chapter from a work in progress (Hitler’s Ethic[T&SL1] ), historian and scholar Richard Weikart makes the useful observation that Hitler frequently used the word Entwicklung, and explains that the word can be translated as “development,” but was also used by German biologists to mean “evolution.”[ii] This same source also notes that Hitler never used the word “Darwinism.” I offer my own observation that this can be used to argue either that Darwin was not important to Hitler, or that Hitler saw the progress of animal species (including the human animal species) through struggle and the elimination of the unfit as a basic law of life, not as a theory presented by an English scientist.

Reich (New York 1971), p. 103.

[ii] Richard Weikart, Hitler’s Ethic: The Nazi Pursuit of Evolutionary Progress (New York forthcoming 2009), chapt. 2 (“The Cult of Evolutionary Progress”).

[T&SL1]Unpublished work in progress

The failure to understand the dark reality of original sin has nullified from the outset the vast majority of attempts to come to grips with the evils of the Third Reich. People with no firm convictions concerning righteousness, holiness, sin, or evil wander in a maze when they try to understand these matters. They are certain that the Nazis were evil, but are unable to provide any convincing or coherent explanation of the delight in cruelty that is one of the most outstanding features of the Holocaust. A real explanation is possible within a biblical framework. For those who see human nature as basically good, Hitler will forever remain an insoluble riddle—as will many of life’s other problems.

For example, in Daniel Goldhagen’s book Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, a scholar who tries to understand these things without reference to that reality of God which alone gives meaning to ethics and moral standards lists conventional secular explanations for the cruelty of the Nazis.[i] Those who persecuted Jews were (a) coerced, forced to go along to avoid death or imprisonment; (b) blindly following orders with no moral sense; (c) conforming to peer pressure; (d) petty bureaucrats concerned only with their careers; (e) unaware of the big picture, committing individual acts without having a sense of the enormity of the whole.

Goldhagen rightly senses that although these explanations apply to varying degrees in individual cases, they are all somehow inadequate. He suggests that the criminals did evil because they wanted to do so. This is getting closer to the truth—but what is it that makes some people enjoy evil, revel in it, and pursue it to the farthest possible extremes? This question is totally beyond the reach of conventional secular scholarship. It is the problem of sin and evil in the human heart, and the Bible says the human heart is wicked by nature. Thus, any serious attempt to explain the Holocaust must take into account not only its uniquely German characteristics, but also evil itself.

Parenthetically, the title of Goldhagen’s book—Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust—implies that ordinary Germans were slaughtering Jews. This omits the fact that the majority of Germans never voted for Hitler and in fact voted against him. Finding themselves in a dictatorship not of their making, they went along to varying degrees (with rare exceptions), but only a small percentage of Germans were directly involved in the Holocaust.

Victor Klemperer, a Jew who was able to remain in Germany due to his Aryan wife, does not in any way minimize the cruelties of the Third Reich, but also records examples of Germans who went out of their way to demonstrate that they had nothing against him personally. In the second volume of his diary, I Will Bear Witness: A Diary of the Nazi Years 1942-1945, Klemperer states that in the factory where he was forced to work, “ninety-nine percent of the male and female workers are undoubtedly more or less extremely anti-Nazi, well-disposed to the Jews, opposed to the war, weary of tyranny . . .” He adds “but fear of the one percent loyal to the regime, fear of prison, ax, and bullet binds them.”[ii]

To really understand the crimes of the Nazis we need more than stereotypes about Germans. We need coherent concepts of sin and evil. These are provided by biblical teaching. Satan and human wickedness are spiritual realities, not just Bible words, and these powers of sin and evil that drove Hitler and his followers did not disappear when Hitler killed himself. I knew an American years ago who enjoyed bullying people beneath him and then presented a false front of injured innocence when people objected. He once told me “I wish I could have been in the SS,” and I had the distinct impression he wasn’t joking. Those who do not have a convincing explanation for human evil in general can never have a convincing explanation for any particular manifestation of evil—be it Auschwitz, the Soviet Gulag, the Cambodian killing fields, or the abduction and murder of a single child by a random serial killer. Those who are nothing more than indifferent to others also show the power of sin, as do those who knowingly do what is wrong, or even just keep silent because they are afraid of persecution or disapproval.

The belief in the animal nature of man explains some of the more bizarre and seemingly inexplicable aspects of the Holocaust. Hundreds of thousands or even millions of cattle or poultry can be legally and ethically slaughtered to prevent the spread of cattle disease or bird flu. If people are essentially animals, who-except a born weakling, a pacifist windbag, or someone who thoughtlessly parroted Jewish nonsense-would allow poetical ethical notions to interfere with the need to eliminate harmful human beings for the good of society? By the way, I could slaughter a hundred thousand chickens to prevent the spread of bird flu and then go home and enjoy a normal life with my family-and so could someone who rid the earth of some noxious and harmful subhumans.

Also, we breed better forms of cattle or horses, and there is nothing wrong with that. Himmler was being perfectly logical and reasonable in trying to breed better and more advanced types of humans-if, that is, people are essentially no more than animals as Darwinists claim. We use the hair and skin of dead animals-why not do the same with people? To waste the skin and other useful by-products of dead people makes no sense at all-if people are the same as animals.

One of the most weird and difficult aspects of Nazi ideology and actions to comprehend is that they followed logically from certain presuppositions. The Nazis had a clear, consistent, and coherent world-view and acted accordingly. Much of their world view-thought not all of it of course-can be found in the writings of Haeckel, and of many other less prominent German social Darwinists who shared his views.

Returning to our comparison, both Haeckel and Hitler had a sense of hierarchy. Some human animals were higher than, superior to, and worth more than others. This follows logically from an evolutionary scenario-and which group of people, according to secular standards, was the most highly developed in the world? Who had the most advanced technology, and were able to dominate other groups most easily? The Europeans. And who dominated among the Europeans? The Spaniards, the Greeks, the French, the Italians had had their day. The Eastern Europeans were dismissed as backward. It was the northern Europeans, the Germanic peoples, who occupied by right the highest place on the evolutionary tree-all others were beneath them.

Haeckel and Hitler also had an authoritarian and hierarchical view of government. Haeckel never advocated National Socialism-that was (in its final form) inconceivable given the stability of the imperial government. Nevertheless, a shared philosophical hostility to democracy as unhealthy and unnatural, with a strong emphasis on the right of the stronger to dominate, is significant.

Also significant is the very similar concept of God shared by the two men. This was not the God the Judaeo-Christian tradition. It was a god that emerged out of a modern and uniquely German philosophical tradition, a god that was merely the projection of man-made ideas onto the cosmos as a whole. Hitler was not a systematic thinker outside of the limited confines of his ideology, though within those confines he was rigorously logical. Basically his concept of god was a peculiar hybrid: a combination of a Folkish spirit that advanced the human race through the instrumentality of conflict with the German people as its chosen group, and a scientific naturalist view of God as working through, and being understood by, scientific and natural law.

“God” for Haeckel and for Hitler, and for many others of that day, was thus merely an abstract and impersonal concept. It could be described with language borrowed from religion-”Almighty,” “Supreme Being,” “the Creator,” “Providence”-but it was a god invented by human reason and working within the confines of human reason. This is clearly illustrated by Martin Bormann’s concept of God.

It is worth noting how perfectly Bormann’s concepts match Haeckel’s. Some of those concepts are (quoting a Nuremberg document written by Bormann):

National Socialism and Christianity are irreconcilable . . . National Socialism is based on scientific foundations . . . National Socialism on the other hand must always, if it is to fulfill its job in the future, be organized according to the latest knowledge of scientific research . . .

. . . the concepts of Christianity, which in their essential points have been taken over from Jewry.

When we National Socialists speak of a belief in God, we do not understand by God, like naïve Christians and their spiritual opportunists, a human-type being, who sits around somewhere in space . . . The force of natural law, with which all these innumerable planets move in the universe, we call the Almighty or God.

. . . we National Socialists impose on ourselves the demand to live naturally as much as possible, i.e., biologically. The more accurately we recognize and observe the laws of nature and of life, the more we adhere to them, so much the more do we conform to the will of the Almighty.[i]

That Hitler valued science is insufficiently appreciated. Some quotes from his Table Talk could easily have been made by such apostles of the New Atheism and enemies of Christianity as Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, or Richard Dawkins. For example, he reportedly stated that people were attracted to religion by fear of the unknown or by intellectual simplicity, but the time would come “when science can answer all the questions.”[ii]

This source has many comments to that effect. Religion would “crumble” before the “advances of science”; science cannot err too much because it is non-dogmatic and self-correcting. Hitler is quoted as saying, “science postulates the search for, and not the certain knowledge of, the truth.” Religious dogma was in conflict with research, and would collapse “under the battering-ram of science.”[iii]

In what became a minor internet controversy, the aforementioned Richard Dawkins compared one of his opponents, Shmuley Boteach (a Jewish rabbi), to Hitler. Elaborating on his comment, Dawkins was careful to explain that he did not mean Boteach thought like Hitler, or acted like Hitler, only that he sounded like Hitler, or spoke like Hitler.[iv] Not enough people have pointed out that, on the level of ideas, Dawkins can also be compared to Hitler-although Dawkins is far too humane and decent a man to really try and live by the evolutionary theory he professes to believe in. Hitler was much more consistent.

[ii] “Excerpts from Hitler’s Table Talk,” see note 7 above.

[iii] Ibid.

In his book A Mighty Fortress: A New History of the German People 110 B.C. to the 21st Century (London 2004), Prof. Steven Ozment uses the Table Talk to document Hitler’s belief in evolution and in the superiority of science over religion (p 282). He also states that it was the decline of traditional values and the emergence of modern ideology that opened the door to Hitler (pp. 252, 276, 286).

[iv] Richard Dawkins, “My Response to Rabbi Shmuley Boteach,” The Huffington Post; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-dawkins/my-response-to-rabbi-shmu_b_100910.html; accessed September 2008.

The present situation

Christianity is being attacked in America today as never before. On TV shows and in movies, in the news media, in academia, in best-selling books, etc., Christians are being increasingly portrayed as narrow-minded, intolerant, ignorant, hypocritical, and even evil. This goes beyond mere ridicule. The basic teachings of Christianity are being condemned to an extent previously unimagined in this country.

It is being increasingly said that Christianity has had a negative impact on America’s history and culture-not just because of abuses, but because of fundamental characteristics of the religion. It was the Christians, it is argued, who enslaved the blacks, exterminated the Indians, oppressed women, burdened people with guilt and denied them sexual freedom, and forced the gays to stay in the closet.

Christianity has even been blamed for pollution and the destruction of the environment. God’s commandment in Genesis to “subdue” the earth and “have dominion” over the creatures is said to be a license for ecological plundering and pillaging. Never mind that the destruction of the environment only emerged as a serious problem in the modern era, nearly two thousand years after Christ died and rose again. Never mind that those who make the most noise about the destruction of the environment continue to enjoy their wasteful and environmentally destructive modern lifestyles while they attack the Bible.

Part of this negative trend has been increasing attempts to link Christianity and the Bible to Adolf Hitler and the crimes of the Nazis. While it will seem incredible to some that the teachings of Christ and the Bible should be linked to Aryan supremacy, German militarism, the horrors of the death camps, and the extermination of six million Jews, such is sadly the case.

Christianity linked to Naziism

In the recent past, it was much more commonly assumed that Christianity had nothing to do with National Socialism. It was believed that Christianity was basically benevolent, while National Socialism was basically evil, that Hitler was as far removed from the Sermon on the Mount as it is humanly possible to get. The great majority of Americans would have assumed that the Jewish experience in America was the norm, the result of the Christian influence on American culture.

The cultural climate has changed in the last fifty years, however, and the growing power of secularism makes people less inclined to view Christianity so tolerantly. The well-known support of German Christians for Hitler; statements about God, Christianity, and the churches by Hitler and by leading Nazis, including strong opposition to atheism; Hitler’s Catholic upbringing and his Concordat with the Vatican; the fact that Hitler never officially withdrew from the Catholic Church; the official support for “positive Christianity” in the Nazi party platform; the supposed fact that Hitler came to power in an overwhelmingly Christian country; centuries of Christian anti-Semitism; verses in the New Testament that seem hostile to Jews; the massacres of the Canaanites in the Old Testament-all of these and even other arguments have been emphasized by those who see more and more evidence of connections between Hitler and Christianity.

Reputable scholars and historians have studied Hitler’s ideology more objectively. George Mosse’s The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich; Daniel Gasman’s The Scientific Origins of National Socialism; Peter Viereck’s Metapolitics: The Roots of the Nazi Mind; Richard Weikart’s From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany; Michael Mack’s German Idealism and the Jew: The Inner Anti-Semitism of Philosophy and German Jewish Responses; Paul Lawrence Rose’s Revolutionary Antisemitism in Germany from Kant to Wagner-these all show from different perspectives and with different emphases how the 19th century’s secular philosophies opened the door to the emergence of horrors unprecedented in the history of the human race. John Conway’s The Nazi Persecution of the Churches 1933-1945 does not deal with the origins of National Socialism, but it demonstrates that Hitler viewed Christianity as a rival for the allegiance of the German people and sought to eliminate its influence as much as possible, his devious political rhetoric notwithstanding.

The work of these and other authors too numerous to name have had a significant impact, but unfortunately there remain those who seem to relish attacking Christianity. Oblivious to historical realities and misinformed or even hopelessly ignorant of biblical teachings, they continue to try to link Christianity to Hitler. They have had an impact as well, and we should not underestimate them. Too few Christians understand the extent to which what they perceive as a beneficent religion of grace, peace, and forgiveness is increasingly associated by many with the cruelties of the Third Reich.

A Holocaust video checked out from the local library asserts that centuries of Christian anti-Semitism made Jews Hitler’s natural target (completely omitting all of 19th-century secular and racial anti-Semitism). A popular biography of Hitler agrees with a Holocaust scholar that Hitler was just carrying out the policies of the Roman Catholic Church when he slaughtered the Jews. An in-depth academic analysis of the Holocaust published by a prestigious university press and acclaimed by scholars from top American universities refers to the false and “venomous” anti-Jewish teachings of the New Testament and asserts that by demonizing the Jews Christianity played a significant role in laying the foundations for the Holocaust.[i]

The debate over what Hitler believed and where he got his ideas has not merely continued over the years, it has intensified. This is true to such an extent that Richard Evans, editor of the prestigious Journal of Contemporary History has written, “The relationship of German National Socialism to religion in general, and Christianity in particular, has recently moved to the forefront of historical inquiry.”[ii] Partly this is due to a natural human desire for deeper spiritual understanding that the countless secular books about Hitler have not satisfied and will never satisfy. Partly it is due to the fact that linking Hitler to Christianity is an increasingly common tactic in the culture wars. If Naziism can be convincingly blamed on Christian influence, then obviously Christians are potentially dangerous fanatics who deserve to be marginalized or even excluded from the political process as much as possible. This reasoning explains why some believe they are protecting American liberty and democracy by working to eliminate Christian influence. There are those who sincerely believe that they are defending democracy by attacking and marginalizing Christianity.

…

As groundless as such arguments are, they are effective with people who know little about history and nothing about Christianity. In more than one internet debate, I have been referred to Walker’s website for proof that Christianity leads to hatred, cruelty, and fascism. Such accusations have gone for far too long without a direct response. As was the case in Germany, the Christians in America have been too passive and inert while the forces of darkness grow in strength and intensity. The spread of such ideas will affect us directly and has already begun to affect us. We are mistaken if we think that because God has blessed America with liberty in the past, we are therefore guaranteed of this blessing forever.

[ii] Richard Evans, “Naziism, Christianity and Political Religion: A Debate,” Journal of Contemporary History 42, no. 1 (2007), p. 5

Keysor’s book is thought-provoking in the extreme, extensively researched and referenced and written from a clearly intellectual, rather than polemical standpoint. It is a welcome addition to a wide and controversial historiography and is worthy of serious consideration. READ THE WHOLE REVIEW

From the Messianic Times:

On the face of it, the premise that Hitler was a practicing Christian seems to reside in the gutters of the same dark, dead-end road as eugenics, Holocaust denials, and The Protocols of Zion. The conclusion seems so absurd, that an entire tome dedicated to its dismantling feels like overkill. Unfortunately, a modicum of investigation shows that it is necessary to refute this notion.

In the last fifteen years or so, the idea that from birth to bunker, Hitler was a Christian, has gained enough traction as to be taken seriously in academic circles— so much so, that author Joe Keysor felt compelled to definitively counter this absurd misconception in his new book, Hitler, The Holocaust, and The Bible.  [Full review available only to subscribers.]

From Don Hank writing at the John Birch Society:

Keysor notes something that no other historians seem to have noticed despite the fastidious research into the Third Reich, namely, the salient effect of secular influences on Hitler and the major secularizing influence of modernist theology on biblical Christianity in Germany long before Hitler emerged. Keysor points out that the secular philosophers who influenced Hitler most were Kant, Fichte and Hegel, as well as certain others. But the Folkish tradition, “with its uniquely German interpretations of Darwinism, added immensely to the respectability of the movement” as “…articulated in the writings of the eminent German Darwinist Ernst Haeckel.”

Keysor writes that, while historians constantly point to supposed religious fanaticism (Crusades, Inquisition) as a dangerous ingredient in politics, no one points out that “the atrocities of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro and Pol Pot, are much more relevant to our own times and even some centuries ago, and much greater in terms of the numbers slain…” and yet they “are not held up as examples of the dangers inherent in trying to organize society by reason alone.”

From Sntjohnny.com:

Extensively researched with an immense bibliography to boast, Mr. Keysor’s book exhaustively mines the writings that Hitler himself cited as influential (if anyone care’s about Hitler as an authoritative source on the matter, of course) and writings that perhaps were not expressly cited but clearly reflected in Hitler’s ideology.

Mr. Keysor astutely observes, “Odd, that for so many people the 16th century and the 1st century had so much to do with the Holocaust, and the 19th century had nothing to do with it.” (pg 70)

This completely jibes with my assessment of the situation, too.

From Atheism is Dead (an exhaustive review!)

Overall, Joe Keysor’s “Hitler, the Holocaust, and the Bible” is a great read which combines the excitement of a thriller, the intellectual satisfaction of carefully considered historical information and logic, the dichotomous nature of polemics, along with an emotional roller coaster.

This is a very serious book on one of world history’s most serious subjects and yet, I have never laughed so often whilst reading such seriousness as Joe Keysor’s commonsensical approach exposed the sheer nakedness of the pseudo-skeptic propagandists time and time, and time and time again with a touch of gentle “irreverent” whit with an occasional touch of sarcasm.

Surely, it is an important contribution to the historical study of Adolf Hitler and Nazism, the discernment of polemics and propaganda, the sensitive nature of multi-cultural relationships, and the essential importance of treating the Bible and Christianity in a fair and hermeneutically appropriate manner.

From James Hannam at Quodilbeta:

I’m no specialist on the Nazis but luckily I know a man who is. My friend Edward Bartlett-Jones, while certainly no Nazi himself, does appear to know far more about them than might be considered healthy. Some say he has the score of Wagner’s Die Walküre embroidered into his bathrobe, others claim that he leaves copies of Nietzsche’s Also sprach Zarathustra in dentists’ waiting rooms. Needless to say, he lives in Berlin. He is also an agnostic and so I thought I should send him Keysor’s Hitler, the Holocaust and the Bible for an expert opinion. He replied,

Overall I think it’s a good book but it has a strong Christian bias. The research is commendably thorough and without going back through the original sources, I didn’t see anything that struck me as being taken out of context. There is a good summary of Hitler’s philosophy (p48-49) and anyone who still thinks Hitler was a Catholic should be persuaded otherwise by page 87. There is also a good explanation of what Hitler meant by “God” on pages 93 to 94.

From Chris writing at AtheismisDead:

In Joe Keysor’s well-timed book, “Hitler, the Holocaust, and the Bible,” the reader is taken into the intriguing but sobering worldview that drove the machinations of Hitler’s regime. The timing is right, because Joe Keysor recognizes that when Reductio ad Hitlerum arguments against Christianity are packaged in philosophical sophistry and served up by the disarming bespectacled professor, that it is time to call the bluff.

Aschheim, Steven A. In Times of Crisis: Essays on European Culture, Germans, and Jews. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 2001.

Avrich, Paul. Russian Rebels 1600-1800. New York / London: W.W. Norton Company, 1972.

Bascomb, Neal. Hunting Eichmann: How a Band of Survivors and a Young Spy Agency Chased Down the World’s Most Notorious Nazi. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009.

Behe, Michael. The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism. New York / London: Free Press, 2007.

Bentley, James. Martin Niemöller. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1984.

Browning, Christopher R. Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in  Poland. New York: Harper Perennial, 1998.

Chamberlain, Houston Stewart. The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century; online version of The Foundations of the 19th Century. Translated by John Lees. London: John Lane, The Bodley Head, 1912; http://www.hschamberlain.net/index.html; accessed January 2008.

Cohen, Nick. What’s Left? London: Harper Perennial, 2007.

Cohn-Sherbok, Dan. Fifty Key Jewish Thinkers. New York / London: Routledge, 2007.

Conway, J.S. The Nazi Persecution of the Churches 1933-1945. Vancouver: Regent, 1968.

———. Review of Elisabeth Schmitz und ihre Denkschrift gegen die Judenverfolgung. Konturen einer vergessenen Biographie (1893-1977). Edited by Manfred Gailus. Association of Contemporary Church Historians (Arbeitsgemeinschaft kirchlicher Zeitgeschichtler) Newsletter vol. XIV, no. 11 (November 2008); http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/akz/akz2811.htm; accessed January 2009.

“The Cosmic Consciousness of a Dynamic Trio: The Hitler Connection,” How the Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche Explains the Resurrection and Eternal Return of Jesus Christ; http://lempisophia.org/Title%20Page.htm; accessed December 2006.

Craig, Gordon A. “Enshrining the Fuhrer,” The New York Times August 25, 1985; http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A07E4D7163BF936A1575BC0A963948260; accessed January 2008.

Darwin, Charles. The Descent of Man. The Secular Web: Library: Historical Documents; http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/charles_darwin/descent_of_man/; accessed June 2008.

“Dawkins: Religion equals ‘child abuse’: Scientist compares Moses to Hitler, calls New Testament ‘sado-masochistic doctrine’”, Faith Under Fire: WorldNetDaily; http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48252; accessed May 2007.

Day, Vox. The Irrational Atheist: Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens. Dallas: Benbella Books, 2008.

Diephouse, David J. “Antisemitism as Moral Discourse: Theophil Wurm and Protestant Opposition to the Holocaust.” Paper presented to the 30th Annual Scholar’s Conference on the Holocaust and the Churches, Philadelphia, March 2000. CD-ROM Sourcebook, Philadelphia, Geneva: Vista Intermedia, 2001.

Edwards, David L. “Rudolf Bultmann: Scholar of Faith.” Christian Century, September 1-8 (1976), 728-730. Religion Online; http://www.religiononline.org/showarticle.asp?title=1827; accessed May 2007.

Engelmann, Bernt. In Hitler’s Germany: Everyday Life in the Third Reich. Translated by Krishna Winston. New York: Pantheon Books, 1986.

“Enlightenment: The French Revolution,” Florida Holocaust Museum; http://www.flholocaustmuseum.org/history_wing/antisemitism/enlightenment.cfm; accessed May 2007.

Evans, Richard J. The Coming of the Third Reich. New York / London: Penguin Books, 2005.

_______. “Nazism, Christianity and Political Religion: A Debate,” Journal of Contemporary History 42, no. 1 (2007), 5-7.

“Excerpts from Hitler’s Table Talk,” Kevin’s Articles on Religion (citing the edition by Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London 1953); http://davnet.org/kevin/articles/table.html; accessed June 2008.

Feldberg, Michael. “John Adams embraces a Jewish homeland,” Homepage for Lewis Loflin; http://www.sullivan-county.com/id2/adams_jews.htm; accessed January 2008.

Fest, Joachim C. Hitler. Translated by Richard and Clara Winston. New York / London: Harcourt Brace, 1974.

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. “Addresses to the German Nation,” Internet Modern History Sourcebook; http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1806fichte.html; accessed January 2008. http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1807fichte1.html; accessed January 2008.

———. Addresses to the German Nation. Translated by R.F. Jones and G.H. Turnbull. Chicago and London: Open Court Publishing, 1922.

———. Addresses to the German Nation. Translated by R.F. Jones and G.H. Turnbull, Ed. George Armstrong Kelly. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.

Frank, Walter S. “Adolf Hitler: The Making of a Fuhrer (Who was Responsible?),” Smoter .com; http://www.smoter.com/hitler.htm; accessed January 2008.

Friedländer, Saul. The Years of Extermination: Nazi Germany and the Jews 1939-1945. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2007.

Gasman, Daniel. The Scientific Origins of National Socialism. New Brunswick USA / London: Transaction Publishers, 2004.

Gay, Peter. Weimar Culture: The Outsider as Insider. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.

Gilbert, Martin. The Holocaust: A History of the Jews of Europe During the Second World War. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1985.

Glazov, Jamie. United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror. Los Angeles: WND Books, 2009.

Goldberg, Jonah. Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning. New York: Doubleday, 2007.

Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah. Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996.

Golomb, Jacob and Robert Wistrich, Eds. Introduction to “Nietzsche, Godfather of Fascism? On the Uses and Abuses of Philosophy,” Princeton University Press; http://www.pupress.princeton.edu/chapters/i7403.html; accessed January 2008.

Green, Lowell C. Lutherans Against Hitler: The Untold Story. St. Louis: Concordia, 2007.

Guinness, Os. Unspeakable: Facing up to Evil in an Age of Genocide and Terror. New York: HarperSanFrancisco, 2005.

Gundry, Stanley N. and Steven B. Cowan, Eds. Five Views on Apologetics. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2000.

Haeckel, Ernst. The Riddle of the Universe at the Close of the Nineteenth Century. Translated by Joseph McCabe. London: Rationalist Press, 1900.

Hallie, Philip. Lest Innocent Blood Be Shed: The Story of the Village of Le Chambon and How Goodness Happened There. New York: Harper and Row, 1979.

Hankins, Barry. Francis Schaeffer and the Shaping of Evangelical America. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2008.

Harris, Sam. The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason. London: The Free Press, 2006.

———. “Response to Controversy”;

http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/response-to-controversy2/; accessed September 2008.

Harrison, Paul. “Hegel: Philosophy and history as theology,” Pantheist History; http://members.aol.com/pantheism0/hegel.htm; accessed January 2008.

F.A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007.

Heer, Jeet. “Enlightened Kant Racist,” Review of German Idealism and the Jew: The Inner Anti-Semitism of Philosophy and German Jewish Responses, by Michael Mack. Adelaide Institute; http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Germany/kant.htm; accessed January 2008.

Hegel, G.W. The Philosophy of History. Translated by J. Sibree. Great Books of the Western World, Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952.

Hegel, G.W. The Philosophy of Right. Translated by T.M. Knox. Great Books of the Western World, Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952.

“Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (Third Part: Ethical Life, iii. The State),” Hegel by HyperText; http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/pr/prstate2.htm#PR324; accessed January 2008.

Heine, Heinrich. On the History of Religion and Philosophy in Germany. Translated by Howard Pollack Milgate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Henry, Matthew. “Commentary on the Whole Bible,” Christian Classics Ethereal Library, Calvin College; http://www.ccel.org/h/henry/mhc2/MHC00000.HTM; accessed January 2008.

“The Hep! Hep! Riots,” Gates to Jewish Heritage; http://www.jewishgates.com/file.asp?File_ID=80; accessed March 2006.

Hicks, Stephen R. C. Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault. Phoenix, AZ: Scholargy Publishing, 2004.

Hitler, Adolf. Mein Kampf; http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/; accessed July 2007.

———. Mein Kampf. Translated by Ralph Manheim. Boston / New York: Mariner Books, 1999.

———. Speeches; http://www.adolfhitler.ws/lib/speeches/text/speeches.htm; accessed April 2006.

______. Hitler Speeches and Quotes. London: World Propaganda Classics, 2008.

______. Hitler’s Second Book: The Unpublished Sequel to Mein Kampf. Translated by Krista Smith. New York: Enigma Books, 2006.

“The Hitler No One Knows,” German Propaganda Archive, Calvin College: from Heinrich Hoffmann, Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt (Berlin: “Zeitgeschichte” Verlag, 1932); http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/hitler2.htm; accessed January 2008.

“The Hitler of Mein Kampf”; http://www.geocities.com/mikem2u/meinkampf.html; accessed January 2008.

Hockenos, Matthew. Review of The Reluctant Revolutionary: Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Collision with Prusso-German History, by John A. Moses; Association of Contemporary Church Historians     (Arbeitsgemeinschaft kirchlicher Zeitgeschichtler) Newsletter vol. XV, no. 7 (July 2009); http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/akz/akz2907.htm; accessed July 2009.

Hoess, Rudolf. Commandant of Auschwitz. Translated by Constantine Fitzgibbon. London: Phoenix Press, 2000.

Hollingdale, R.J. Nietzsche: The Man and His Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Horne, Alistair. The Age of Napoleon. New York: Modern Library, 2006.

Hughes, John Jay. “A Mass Murderer Repents,” Institute for Christian Spirituality; http://theology.shu.edu/lectures/massmurder.htm; accessed January 2008.

Ibrahim, Raymond. “The Al Qaeda Reader and Mein Kampf,” FrontPageMagazine.com, Friday, November 09, 2007; http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=4EDEB0E8-C6B0-4147-883D-D37738482652; accessed February 2008.

Jäckel, Eberhard. Hitler’s World View: A Blueprint for Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.

Jefferson, Thomas. “Syllabus of an Estimate of the Merit of the Doctrines of Jesus, Compared with Those of Others.” http://www.angelfire.com/co/JeffersonBible/jeffbsyl.html; accessed January 2008.

Johnson, Paul. Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties. New York: Harper Perennial, 1991.

———. A History of the Jews. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1987.

Johnson, Phillip E. The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of Naturalism. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2000.

Judaken, Jonathan. Review of From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany, by Richard Weikart. H-Ideas, H-Net Reviews, June, 2005; http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=80951126890820; accessed May 2007.

Just, Dieter. “Ich denke—also bin ich nicht.” English summary by Herbert Renz-Polster; http://www.d-just.de/text1eng.htm; accessed January 2008.

Kalish, Michael. “Friedrich Nietzsche’s Influence on Hitler’s Mein Kampf”; http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/marcuse/classes/133p/133p04papers/MKalishNietzNazi046.htm; accessed January 2008.

Kant, Immanuel. An Answer to the Question: “What is Enlightenment?”. Translated by H.B. Nisbet. London: Penguin Books, 2009.

Katz, Steven A. The Holocaust in Historical Context (Vol. 1). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

Kay, James. Review of Christian Faith in Dark Times: Theological Conflicts in the Shadow of Hitler, by Jack Forstman. Theology Today 50, no. 4 (January 1993); http://theologytoday.ptsem.edu/jan1994/v50-4-bookreview6.htm; accessed May 2007.

Kershaw, Ian. Hitler, 1889-1936: Hubris. New York / London: W. W. Norton, 2000.

______. The Nazi Dictatorship: Problems and Perspectives of Interpretation. London: Arnold, 2000.

Kimel, Alexander. “Holocaust and Christianity,” Holocaust Educational Digest; http://www.kimel.net/christi.html; accessed January 2008.

Klemperer, Victor. I Will Bear Witness: A Diary of the Nazi Years 1942-1945. Translated by Martin Chalmers. New York: Random House / Modern Library, 2001.

Kubizek, August. The Young Hitler I Knew. Translated by Geoffrey Brooks. London: Greenhill Books, 2006.

Kupelian, David. The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as Freedom. Nashville, TN: WND Books, 2005.

Laqueur, Walter. Weimar: A Cultural History. New York: Perigee, 1980.

Levi, Primo. The Reawakening. Translated by Stuart Wolf. New York: Touchstone Books, 1995.

Livingstone, David. “Plato the Kabbalist,” Illuminati Conspiracy Archive; http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NewAge/Plato_Kabbalist.htm; accessed January 2008.

Lukacs, John. The Hitler of History. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1997.

Luther, Martin. On the Jews and Their Lies. Translated by Martin H. Bertram. Humanitas International; http://www.humanitas-international.org/showcase/chronography/documents/luther-jews.htm; accessed January 2008.

______. Martin Luther: Selections from his Writings. Edited by John Dillenberger. New

York: Anchor Books, 1962.

______. Table Talk. Translated by Theodore G. Tappert (Luther’s Works vol. 54). Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1967.

______. The Table Talk of Martin Luther. Translated by William Hazlitt. Center for Reformed Theology and Apologetics; http://www.reformed.org/master/index.html?

mainframe=/documents/Table_Talk/table_talk.html; accessed June 2009.

Mack, Michael. German Idealism and the Jew: The Inner Anti-Semitism of Philosophy and German Jewish Responses. Chicago / London: University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Marcuse, Harold and Werner Cohn. “Correspondence about Niemöller’s Antisemitism”; http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/marcuse/projects/niem/NiemAntisemCohnHMCorresp034.htm; accessed January 2008.

Maser, Werner. Hitler’s Letters and Notes. New York: Harper and Row, 1974.

McGrath, Alister. The Twilight of Atheism: The Rise and Fall of Disbelief in the Modern World. London: Rider, 2004.

Mencken, H.L. “Introduction to Nietzsche’s Antichrist,” The Gutenberg Project; http://www.gutenberg.org/files/19322/19322-h/19322-h.htm; accessed August 2008.

Michael, Robert. “Theological Myth, German Antisemitism, and the Holocaust: The Case of Martin Niemoeller.” Holocaust and Genocide Studies: An International Journal, vol. 2, no. 1 (1987), 105-22.

Montgomery, John Warwick. In Defense of Martin Luther. Milwaukee, WI: Northwestern Publishing House, 1970.

______. Tractatus Logico-Theologicus. Bonn: Culture and Science Publishing, 2003.

Moore, Gregory. Excerpt from Nietzsche, Biology and Metaphor, (Cambridge University Press Catalogue); http://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/12306/excerpt/9780521812306_excerpt.pdf; accessed January 2008.

Mosse, George L. The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich. New York: Grosset & Dunlap, 1971.

Myers, Peter. Review of Nietzsche and Jewish Culture, Jacob Golomb, ed.; http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/nietzsche.html; accessed January 2008.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. “Der Antichrist: Fluch auf das Christenthum,” The Nietzsche Channel; http://www.geocities.com/thenietzschechannel/antig.htm; accessed December 2007.

———. The Antichrist: Curse on Christianity. Translated by Walter Kaufmann, The Nietzsche Channel; http://www.geocities.com/thenietzschechannel/anti.htm; accessed December 2007.

———. The Antichrist: Curse on Christianity. Translated by H.L. Mencken; http://www.primitivism.com/antichrist.htm; accessed August 2008.

———. Beyond Good and Evil, translated by Ian Johnston; http://www.mala.bc.ca/~johnstoi/Nietzsche/beyondgoodandevil8.htm; accessed January 2008.

———. “Nietzsche contra Wagner,” The Nietzsche Channel; http://www.geocities.com/thenietzschechannel/ncw.htm#for; accessed January 2008.

———. On the Genealogy of Morals: A Polemical Tract. Translated by Ian Johnston; http://www.mala.bc.ca/~johnstoi/Nietzsche/genealogytofc.htm; accessed January 2008.

“Nietzsche: Letters of Insanity,” The Nietzsche Channel; http://www.geocities.com/thenietzschechannel/niletters.htm; accessed January 2008.

Orenstein, Phil. “Heil, Professor!” FrontPageMagazine.com, July 14, 2006; http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=23293; accessed May 2007.

Ozment, Steven. A Mighty Fortress: A New History of the German People (110 B.C. to the 21st Century). London: Granta Books, 2004.

Padfield, Peter. Himmler: Reichsfuhrer-SS. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1990.

Pascal, Blaise. Pensées. Translated by A.J. Krailsheimer. London: Penguin Books, 1995.

Pashak, Barrett. Review of German Idealism and the Jew: The Inner Anti-Semitism of Philosophy and German Jewish Responses, by Michael Mack. Constantinbrunner.info; http://www.constantinbrunner.info/pages/mack.htm; accessed January 2008.

Peukert, Detlev J. The Weimar Republic: The Crisis of Classical Modernity. Translated by Richard Deveson. New York: Hill and Wang, 1992.

Pollock, John. A Foreign Devil in China. Minneapolis, MN: World Wide Publications, 1988.

“Pre-1933 Nazi Posters,” German Propaganda Archive, Calvin College; http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/posters1.htm; accessed January 2008.

“The Private and Political Testaments of Hitler, April 29, 1945”; http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1945/450429a.html; accessed May 2007.

Reck-Malleczewen, Friedrich. Diary of a Man in Despair. Translated by Paul Rubens. London: Audiogrove Ltd., 1995.

Rees, Lawrence. Auschwitz: The Nazis and the ‘Final Solution.’ London: Ebury Publishing 2005.

———. The Nazis: A Warning from History. New York: New Press, 1997.

Richards, Robert J. “Ernst Haeckel’s Alleged Anti-Semitism and Contributions to Nazi Biology”; http://home.uchicago.edu/~rjr6/articles/Haeckel–antiSemitism.pdf; accessed June 2008.

Rose, Paul Lawrence. German Question / Jewish Question: Revolutionary Antisemitism from Kant to Wagner. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.

______. Wagner: Race and Revolution. New Haven / London: Yale University Press, 1992.

Rosenbaum, Ron. Explaining Hitler. New York: Random House, 1998.

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract. London: Penguin Books, 2004.

Russell, William. Berlin Embassy. New York: Carroll and Graf, 2005.

Ryback, Timothy W. “Hitler’s Forgotten Library: The Man, His Books, and His Search For God.” The Atlantic Monthly, May 2003; http:www.fpp.co.uk/Hitler/library/Atlantic_Monthly.html; accessed May 2007.

Sachar, Abram Leon. A History of the Jews. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1964.

Schaeffer, Francis. The Great Evangelical Disaster. Westchester, IL: Crossway Books, 1984.

Schopenhauer, Arthur. The Horrors and Absurdities of Religion. Translated by R. J. Hollingdale. London: Penguin, 2009.

______. Religion. Translated by T. Bailey Saunders. eBooks@Adelaide; http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/religion/chapter6.html; accessed May 2007.

______. The World as Will and Idea. Translated by R. B. Haldane and J. Kemp. Internet Archive;   http://www.archive.org/stream/theworldaswillan01schouoft/theworldaswillan01schouoft_djvu.txt; accessed September, 2009.

Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. Letters from a Stoic (Epistulae Morales ad Lucilium). Translated by Robin Campbell. London: Penguin, 2004.

Shirer, William L. Berlin Diary. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1941.

———. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1960.

Shyovitz, David. “The Hep Hep Riots,” Jewish Virtual Library; http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/anti-semitism/hep.html; accessed May 2007.

Singer, Peter. Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Smith, James K. A. Who’s Afraid of Postmodernism? Taking Derrida, Lyotard, and Foucault to Church. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008.

Snell, John, ed. The Nazi Revolution: Germany’s Guilt or Germany’s Fate?. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1959.

Spengler. “Islam: Religion or political ideology?,” Asia Times Online; http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/FH10Aa01.html; accessed May 2007.

Stalin, Joseph. “Dialectical and Historical Materialism,” The Art Bin; http://art-bin.com/art/ostalineng.html; accessed January 2008.

Steigmann-Gall, Richard. The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Stein, Leo. “Niemoller speaks!” The National Jewish Monthly May 1941; Homepage of Harold Marcuse; www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/marcuse/projects/niem/njm415/NatJewMonthly415.htm; accessed January 2008.

Stein, Stuart. “Individual Responsibility of Defendants: Julius Streicher,” Nuremberg Judgment; http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/Streicher.htm; accessed January 2008.

Steinberg, Stefan. “One hundred years since the death of Friedrich Nietzsche: a review of his ideas and influence—Parts 1–3,” World Socialist Web Site; www.wsws.org/articles/2000/oct2000/niet-o20.shtml; accessed January 2008; www.wsws.org/articles/2000/oct2000/niet-o21.shtml; accessed January 2008; www.wsws.org/articles/2000/oct2000/niet-o23.shtml; accessed January 2008.

Stephens, Don. War and Grace: Short Biographies from the World Wars. Darlington: Evangelical Press, 2005.

Stewart, Jon. Introduction to The Hegel Myths and Legends; http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/stewart.htm; accessed January 2008.

Swan, James. “Martin Luther’s Attitude Toward the Jews,” New Testament Research Ministries;   http://www.ntrmin.org/Luther%20and%20the%20Jews%20(Web).htm#a1; accessed June 2009.

Teo, Thomas. “The historical problematization of ‘mixed race’ in psychological and human-scientific discourses”; http://www.yorku.ca/tteo/teach/Teo2004.htm; accessed January 2008.

Thomas, Robert. “The Nature of Nazi Ideology,” Libertarian Alliance; www.libertarian.co.uk/lapubs/histn/histn015.pdf; accessed January 2008.

Thornton, Ted. “Persecution of the Jews in Europe,” History of the Middle East Data Base; http://www.nmhschool.org/tthornton/mehistorydatabase/christian_persecution_of_the_jew.php; accessed January 2008.

Toland, John. Adolf Hitler. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Co., 1976.

“Toledoth Yeshu,” Ancient Jewish Accounts of Jesus, [Text from Goldstein, Jesus in the Jewish Tradition, pp. 148-154.]; http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/humm/Topics/JewishJesus/toledoth.html; accessed January 2008.

“The Trial of Adolf Eichmann,” Session 105 (Part 4 of 4), The Nizkor Project; http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/e/eichmann-adolf/transcripts/Sessions/Session-105-04.html; accessed January 2008.

Triumph des Willens (Triumph of the Will), directed by Leni Riefenstahl; http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1624809629731313480; accessed July 2007.

“The 25 Points of Hitler’s Nazi Party,” Scrapbookpages.com; http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauScrapbook/25Points.html; accessed January 2008.

Tyndale, William. The Obedience of a Christian Man. London: Penguin Books, 2000.

van Vrekhem, Georges. Hitler and his God: The Background of the Hitler Phenomenon. New Delhi: Rupa and Co., 2006.

Viereck, Peter. Meta-politics: The Roots of the Nazi Mind. New York: Capricorn Books, 1965.

von Lang, Jochen, and Claus Sibyll, Eds. Eichmann Interrogated: Transcripts from the Archives of the Israeli Police. Translated by Ralph Manheim. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, 1983.

von Metternich, Prince Klemens. Memoirs of Prince Metternich (1880—Vol. 03), “free online text repository”; http://www.literature.at/elib/index.php5?title=Metternich_-_Memoirs_of_Prince_Metternich_-_1880_-_Vol_03; accessed July 2008.

Wagner, Richard. “Hero-dom and Christendom.” Translated by William Ashton Ellis; http://users.belgacom.net/wagnerlibrary/prose/waghero.htm; accessed October 2007.

———. “Introduction to a Work of Count Gobineau’s.” Translated by William Ashton Ellis; http://users.belgacom.net/wagnerlibrary/prose/wlpr0155.htm; accessed October 2007.

———. “Know Thyself.” Translated by William Ashton Ellis; http://users.belgacom.net/wagnerlibrary/prose/wagknow.htm; accessed October 2007.

———. “On State and Religion.” Translated by William Ashton Ellis; http://users.belgacom.net/wagnerlibrary/prose/wagstarel.htm; accessed October 2007.

———. “Religion and Art.” Translated by William Ashton Ellis; http://users.belgacom.net/wagnerlibrary/prose/wlpr0126.htm; accessed October 2007.

Walker, Jim. “Hitler’s Christianity,” NoBeliefs.com; http://www.nobeliefs.com/Hitler1.htm; accessed January 2008.

———. “Thomas Jefferson on Christianity and Religion,” NoBeliefs.com; http://www.nobeliefs.com/jefferson.htm; accessed January 2008.

Wang, Stephen. The Long Road to Freedom: The Story of Wang Mingdao. Tonbridge: Sovereign World, 2002.

Ward, Keith. Pascal’s Fire: Scientific Faith and Religious Understanding. Oxford: One World, 2006.

“Was Hitler an atheist…?” Critical Thought and Religious Liberty; http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/quotes_hitler.html; accessed January 2008.

Weikart, Richard. From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2004.

———. Hitler’s Ethic: The Nazi Pursuit of Evolutionary Progress. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

Weil, Simon. Wagner and the Jews; http://members.aol.com/wagnerbuch/intro.htm; accessed January 2008.

Wesley, John. The Journal of John Wesley. Oxford: Lion Publishing, 2003.

Whitefield, George. George Whitefield’s Journals. Edinburgh: Banner of Truth Trust, 1998.

Wicks, Robert. “Arthur Schopenhauer,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2003/entries/schopenhauer/; accessed January 2008.

Wiesel, Eli. “The Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech,” published in Night, Translated by Marion Wiesel. New York: Hill and Wang, 2006.

Wistrich, Robert S. Hitler and the Holocaust: How and Why the Holocaust Happened. London: Phoenix Press, 2002.

Introduction ……………………….……………………………Page 1

Part I: Christianity and National Socialism

Chapter 1.    The New Testament and the Jews  ……………..Page 14

The Hep riots … A great and terrible mystery … The biblical concept of Satan … The devilish nature of anti-Semitism … Original sin … Christian servants of the devil … What is a Christian? … Did Hitler or the Nazi Christians bear good fruit? … The Bible as the source of anti-Semitism … Paul’s teaching of salvation by grace through faith—an attack on Judaism? … The New Testament’s description of Jews … The crucifixion of Christ … Pontius Pilate and the guilt of the Gentiles … “His blood be on us” … Has God rejected the Jews? … Who are the children of the devil? … The Holocaust and the Old Testament … The massacres of the Canaanites … The Nuremberg racial laws … Hitler’s study notes on the Bible … The Christian way of holiness

Chapter 2.    Medieval Christian anti-Semitism ……………..Page 53

Introduction … An analogy … The Jewish experience in the Middle Ages … Christian limitations … Concepts of the Jews … Christian doctrinal criticisms of Judaism … Concepts of government … Moral doctrines … The restraints in practice … Government protection of Jews … The Crusades … The Church of Rome and the Jews … John Chrysostom … The apostles’ attitudes toward the Jews … Chrysostom’s motive … Martin Luther … Some misconceptions about Luther … Luther and the Nazis … Luther in perspective … A secular evaluation of Luther … Luther’s goal … Matthew Henry and Romans 11 … A glimpse ahead … Conclusion

Chapter 3.    Hitler’s secular and ungodly ideas ……………..Page 92

Hitler in the light of scripture … A blatant absence of Christian doctrines … Hitler’s unbiblical principles (i) … Hitler’s unbiblical principles (ii) … Hostility to Christianity in Mein Kampf … An honest liar … Hitler the Catholic? … Honest Adolf strikes again …  Christ in Mein Kampf … Hitler’s last will and testament … Hitler’s references to God … Hitler’s references to the Bible … Hitler’s expressions of support for Christianity and the German churches … The example of the trade unions … The Nazi party platform supported “positive” Christianity … Hitler’s policy toward the churches – words contradicted by deeds … A blueprint for the future … Nazi church policies in Austria … Nazi church policies in the Warthegau … Hitler linked to Christianity … A. Hatred and fear of Christianity … A bias revealed … B. A lack of information … C. Illogical arguments … D. Misstatements of fact … Hitler’s Table Talk … Quotes from Hitler’s followers … Nazi photos … Nazi artifacts … E. Ignorance of Christianity … Paul’s letter to the Galatians … What was Hitler?

Chapter 4.    The Christians in Nazi Germany ………….….Page 162

Judging by outward appearances … Modern Germany – a Christian nation? … How did Hitler deceive an entire nation? He didn’t. … A master of deceit … The churches’ responsibility for Hitler’s rise … Intimidation, violence, repression, and fear … A question of human nature … A few rare exceptions … Christian opposition to the euthanasia program … Hitler’s policy toward the churches … Alfred Rosenberg … Consolidation, rearmament, and war … Three lines of attack … 1. Administrative control … 2. The ideological challenge … 3. Persecution … The response of the churches … The Confessing Church … The Barmen Declaration … An ineffectual protest … The Germanic Christians … The culmination of apostasy … Wellhausen and Bultmann … The Catholics … The Concordat … The failure of the churches to speak out for the Jews … Martin Niemoller … A sermon by Niemoller … Dietrich Bonhoeffer … What should have been done? … Romans 13 – the authority of government and the sovereignty of God … A Christmas in Nazi Germany … Christians in other lands

Part II: The Origins of National Socialism

Chapter 5.   The philosophical background ………….……..Page 227

The mystery of Hitler … The need for a world view … An analogy … The role of technology … Some Russian history … Germany, Russia, China, Italy, and Japan … The roots of an ideology … Hitler’s world view … A well-behaved young man … Descartes and the “Enlightenment” … A few words about the French Revolution and Napoleon … The “Enlightenment” in Germany … A brief overview … Kant …German philosophy and anti-Semitism in Mein Kampf … Kant’s racism … Concluding thoughts on Kant … Hitler and Fichte … Hitler the intellectual? … Fichte and National Socialism … Fichte, the Jews, and Christianity … The danger of philosophy … Friedrich Ludwig Jahn … Hegel … Hegel’s philosophy … Hegel and the Jews …Schopenhauer … Schopenhauer’s anti-Semitism … Gobineau … The Folkish movement … Paul Lagarde … German romanticism … The

intensification of Folkish tendencies … Julius Langbehn … The Pan-German Association … The Folkish movement and Christianity

Chapter 6.   Wagner ………………….……………………….Page 304

A Folkish prophet … A problem of philosophy … The importance of racial purity … Racial unity and the need for a leader … Wagner’s socialism … Wagner and Christianity … Wagner and the Jews … Wagner and Hitler … Some clarification … Hitler’s youthful anti-Semitism

Chapter 7.   Chamberlain ……………………………………Page 334

A spiritual founder of National Socialism … Chamberlain on the Jews – a philosophical and scientific approach … Two key presuppositions … A secular history of the Jewish people … The Jewish idea … The influence of Judaism … The revelation of Christ?

Chapter 8.   Haeckel ……………………….…………………Page 362

Darwin, Haeckel, and Hitler … A barrier assaulted … Did Hitler believe Darwin’s theory? … Daniel Gasman’s third way … The marriage of science and philosophy … The practical implication’s of Haeckel’s ideas … Haeckel’s ethics … Euthanasia … Haeckel’s anti-Semitism … Haeckel’s idea of God … Haeckel’s unscientific ideas … A brief overview … Haeckel and Hitler … Did Haeckel influence Hitler? … Haeckel and Darwin

Chapter 9.  Nietzsche ………………………………….………Page 399

The quintessentially modern man … The Nazi philosopher? … Nietzsche’s Antichrist … Nietzsche and Christianity … Nietzsche and the Jews … Nietzsche’s view of Christ … Paul and the emergence of Christianity … The Jewish menace to civilization … More teachings of The Antichrist … On the Genealogy of Morals … Hitler’s Table Talk … Hitler, the atheistic theist … Concluding thoughts on Nietzsche

Conclusion ……………………………….…….………..……Page 434

Bibliography ………………………………………….……….Page 454

Index  …………………………………………………………..Page 462

Also examined is the secular nature of Hitler’s thought. Hitler’s hostility to Jewish-inspired Christianity is shown, and his philosophical roots in German philosophy, secular racial anti-Semitism, and German interpretations of Darwinism are explored. It was human wisdom, not the Bible, that opened the door to Hitler.

Buy the Book

Excerpt from chapter one (more excerpts in menu to right)

Read the preface

Title: Hitler, the Holocaust, and the Bible: A Scriptural Analysis of Anti-Semitism, National Socialism, and the Churches in Nazi Germany Author: Joseph Keysor Release Date: Hitler’s Birthday, April 20th, 2009. Updated Hard Cover:  March 8th, 2010. Soft Cover ISBN: 978-0-9822776-5-2 Hard Cover ISBN: 978-0-9822776-4-5 Pages: 488 Publisher: Athanatos Publishing Group Amazon Link – Hard Cover: Order on Amazon Amazon Link – Soft Cover: Order on Amazon Order soft cover from Publisher: Click Here Order hard cover from Publisher: Click Here Cover Design: Sojourner Design

Author’s Biography:

Joseph Keysor currently teaches English at a private school in Oman, where he has been for over five years. He taught English at private schools, a college, and a university in mainland China for eight years. He has a BA in Russian and East European Studies from MacMurray College and a masters degree in adult education from Northern Illinois University.

Many Christians are unaware of how these and other arguments are being used in the culture wars to link Christians to Hitler and demonize them as a menace to American democracy.

Relying on the bible as the Word of God, Hitler, the Holocaust, and the Bible responds to deceptive attacks on Christianity. The widely misunderstood question of what a Christian is is clarified according to scripture, and hatred and cruelty of any sort are shown to be contrary to the message of Christ. It studies the failure of German Christians — with rare exceptions — to stand for Christ, and shows that blind obedience to Hitler was contrary to biblical Christianity.

Also examined is the secular nature of Hitler’s thought. Hitler’s hostility to Jewish-inspired Christianity is shown, and his philosophical roots in German philosophy, secular racial anti-Semitism, and German interpretations of Darwinism are explored. It was human wisdom, not the Bible, that opened the door to Hitler.

• Title: Hitler, the Holocaust, and the Bible: A Scriptural Analysis of Anti-Semitism, National Socialism, and the Churches in Nazi Germany
• Author: Joe Keysor
  
• Pages: 404
• ISBN: 978-0-9822776-0-7
• Publisher: Athanatos Publishing Group
• Release Date: Hitler’s Birthday, April 20th, 2009.
• Cover Design: Sojourner Design

Author’s Biography:

Joe Keysor currently teaches English at a private school in Oman, where he has been for over five years. He taught English at private schools, a college, and a university in mainland China for eight years. He has a BA in Russian and East European Studies from MacMurray College and a masters degree in adult education from Northern Illinois University.